Posts

Google’s Consent Mode is a way to control how tags react to the user’s consent for different tracking purposes. It is specifically designed to work with Google’s tags, but especially through Google Tag Manager, you can use Consent Mode’s features and APIs to control other tags, too. Consent Mode comes in two “flavors”: Advanced Consent Mode is specifically designed for Google’s products. Tags for GA4, Ads, and Floodlight are sensitive to the user’s consent choices and change their behavior accordingly. Read More…

Google Tag Manager users received an email on March 11th, where Google announced a very cryptic update to Google Tag Manager: As is typical with Google’s email communications, the email raised more questions than it answered. Even though I tackled the email in a LinkedIn thread, there’s still a lot of misunderstanding (and misinformation) going about. In this short article, I’ll explain what Google is going to do on April 10th. Read More…

One of the most popular use cases for server-side Google Tag Manager, often shared on this blog, too, is to split an incoming stream into multiple different endpoints. Since the demise of customTask for Universal Analytics (Rest In Peace!), there hasn’t really been a solid, officially supported way of splitting a single GA4 stream into multiple endpoints. This is useful in case you want to create a “global rollup” property that combines data from multiple local sites, for example. Read More…

There are many reasons why you might want to duplicate your tags (or triggers, or variables, or templates) in Google Tag Manager. One prime example is server-side tagging, where it’s sensible to first build and validate your tracking setup before migrating fully to a server-side approach. Alternatively, you might want to collect analytics data to a second property, for example when you want to have a local and a global dataset for site visit data. Read More…

In this guide, I’ll show you how to add first-party cookie values client-side, which your server-side Google Tag Manager processes can then access. You might be wondering: “Why bother?”. After all, if server-side GTM is running same-site with the website sending the requests, why can’t it just read the cookies on its own, right? Well, true. But there are cases where the website and web server seem to be same-site but are in fact not. Read More…

There are two new custom templates available in server-side Google Tag Manager. These templates have been designed to facilitate Piwik PRO tracking in a server-side container. Piwik PRO Client -> This Client template interacts with the Piwik PRO JavaScript tracker and lets you route Piwik PRO tracking through a server-side GTM container. GitHub repo. Piwik PRO -> The tag template works in unison with the Piwik PRO Client, forwarding the hits to the Piwik PRO endpoint. Read More…

Piwik PRO has two new server-side Google Tag Manager templates, and this article explains what they are and how they work. The first template, Piwik PRO Client, is designed to work in unison with the Piwik PRO HTTP API. Most often these requests are generated by the Piwik PRO JavaScript tracker, but theoretically any HTTP source that uses the same schema can send requests for the Client to claim. Once the Client claims the request, it generates an event data object that can be consumed by tags in the server-side Google Tag Manager container. Read More…

Google has released a new feature, First-Party Mode (FPM), into public beta. Image source First-Party Mode seeks to make it easier to wrap Google’s measurement and advertising technologies in a first-party, same-origin context. This means that the user’s browser, when visiting a website running FPM, would no longer communicate directly with Google’s domains when fetching measurement libraries such as Google Tag or Google Tag Manager. Instead, the requests would be sent to a subfolder of the website itself. Read More…

If you’re using server-side Google Tag Manager, Google (Advanced) Consent Mode and you’re collecting hits to Google Analytics 4, you might have noticed something odd happening when switching consent to granted state. It looks as if your page_view hits as well as any other hits marked as “Conversions” (or key events now, I guess) are automatically redispatched to the server-side Google Tag Manager endpoint when consent is granted! This sounds incredibly useful. Read More…

This will be a quick tip, but it’s here to correct my previous statements in the comments section of different articles on this blog. When using Advanced Consent Mode, Google Analytics 4 collects hits when consent is in "denied" state. These hits have a lot of parameters stripped off them, including identifiers like the Client ID and the Session ID. The hits will not surface in reports directly, but they will instead go through a modeling process to enrich the reports once modeled. Read More…